|
compiled by Eimear McKeith
Tate seeks 'indecent' artwork / and to lose
other works (January 12, 2004)
Tate eyes Shah's Bacon
We reported a short while back - click
here - on a work at London's
Tate Britain that was causing a few problems for Islamic visitors.
In an odd echo of that minor affair, Tehran has a painting which
it considers too indecent to show, but which the Tate would like
to borrow. The painting in question is one of reluctant-Dubliner
Francis Bacon's allegedly most significant works, a triptych entitled
Two figures lying on a bed with attendants. It has been
in storage for almost 25 years.
Bought by the Shah of Iran, it was intended
to be displayed in his wife's museum in Tehran, but because of
the 1979 Iranian revolution, the painting was put in storage -
it was felt by authorities to be unacceptable to Moslem eyes.
|

Francis Bacon, Two
Figures Lying on a Bed with Attendants. Image held here
|
A spokesperson for the Tate said: "We have
requested the loan of the work. But we have yet to receive confirmation.
The museum director is very keen to show the work. It is a major
work by Francis Bacon and it has not been shown for more than
two decades. It is such a key painting and it should be shown
at the home of British art."
The director of the Tate Britain, Stephen Deuchar,
visited the modern art museum in Tehran two years ago and had
the opportunity to view the painting then. Of the plans to borrow
the work, he said (somewhat underwhelmingly), "I thought
it would be rather great to see it in this country in the context
of some other Bacons."
Buying and selling at the Tate
If the Tate is looking to hang one artist from
Ireland, it is apparently thinking of exiling another. Works by
Louis Le Brocquy may be among those it will be auctioning off
in order to "improve their collections."
Sir Nicholas Serota, a director of the Tate,
said: "Sometimes, we find artists are not represented by
the best examples of their work, or perhaps we have two or three
pieces which we are unlikely to show together because they are
close in type."
The institution has said that it would only
consider selling works by living artists and only with their pemission.
Sir Nicholas stated: "There would be no question of selling
a Turner to buy a Hirst".
There is no doubt, however, that whatever paintings
are chosen to be bought and sold, any such decision will be the
subject of much controversy.
Most recent news items:
McGonagle to leave City Arts Centre / art, autism and genius / Santa Fe again (January 9, 2004)
Filling the void: more on the World Trade Centre designs (January 8, 2004)
More on EU art / NIMBY syndrome hits public sculpture (January 7, 2004)
Luas blues / hunger for art (January 6, 2004)
For a full list of news items, click here.
Latest reader
feedback:
News item 603
I have to say I agree with Circa. I have been working on a projec...
News item 624
The idea of exhibiting a group of objects bought on eBay, though ...
News item 617
It'd be interesting to see how many visitors attended the gallery...
News item 603
re. Comment 2 - most people who get turned down for grants have t...
News item 603
'sour grapes aside, what are culture ireland up to?' i think we n...
News item 606
hang on a minute... surely the feller who won the prize at art st...
News item 603
As someone who received a grant from Culture Ireland this year, f...
News item 602
try and make work that doesn't topple over in future!...
Do you have an opinion on this news item? If so, please click
here for our comments form.
| No reader feedback so far - awaiting your input! |
Failed to execute CGI : Win32 Error Code = 2
Back
to top of page
|