|
C104
review
Dublin: Geraldine O'Neill at Kevin Kavanagh
This
is the work of an observational painter who relates directly
to the object and who relishes the challenge of realistic
painting. The subject matter is food in plenty. In fact,
the profusion of fruit and vegetables all piled up in
profusion is overwhelming. Yet these are not innocent
or unselfconscious representations. Viewed through the
perspective of Post-modernism, it is clear that there
is a more complex agenda here. Various pictorial precedents
and conventions are played with, thus mediating between
the objects and their representation.
The most obvious pictorial reference is to the Dutch 17th-century
tradition of still life (excellent examples of which were
available to the painter in the National Gallery of Ireland).
Within Dutch still-life painting there was often another
level of symbolism conveying a moral message like 'vanitas'.
Paintings by O'Neill are not quite that. Nevertheless,
there is a play with symbolic meaning. Her Bird trinity
with dead birds, indicative of morality, is very much
in the Dutch trompe l'oeil manner; it is also reminiscent
of the work of Edward McGuire.
 |
| Geraldine
O'Neill: False teeth, 2002, oil on linen, 56
x 76 cm; courtesy Kevin Kavanagh Gallery |
The central theme of these paintings is food for living
- not a neutral display of objects. In Byrne's pig
the dish of bacon and cabbage is indicated by a pig's
head beside a York cabbage. Ham sandwich is a witty
painting with a tiny toy pig on lettuce and bread. Fish
appear in various places ready for cooking. The wittiest
is False teeth, showing the essential human eating
equipment, but complemented by a doll's head with a miniature
face in the mouth opening, gently satirising the human
appetite.
Toys are repeatedly included, such as toy animals or even
toy vehicles. The clearest use of this is Cowboys and
indians, reminiscent of the work of Mick O'Dea. This
playful spirit is particularly evident in the depiction
of balloons - one of Mickey Mouse - which is an ironic
recycling of Pop Art conventions. Balloons are indeed
appropriate to a celebration of food.
Another pictorial convention is that of Child Art, which
is deliberately introduced in trompe l'oeil 'pictures
within a picture' in two examples. The Child Art 'specimens'
are presented in quotation marks as it were. Landscape
includes a child's schematic drawing of nature which in
its simplification is at the other extreme to the painter's
own meticulous realism in depicting the paper which carries
the highly knowing recreation of Child Art.
The issue of the artificiality of all the paintings is
constantly referred to by the inclusion of a saucepan
with a brush, as well as tubes of paint in several instances.
This is analogous to the symbolic Dutch use of the skull.
The brushes underline the painted artificial nature of
all the lush food which the artist has 'cooked up' through
the technique of oil painting on canvas. In Beetroot
the painted leaves of the vegetable are echoed in a minor
key by the flowery wallpaper of the background, which
in reality is a flat mechanically printed surface, but
here it is lovingly hand-painted. In this way these paintings
are very much 'art about art'.
The largest and by far the most dramatic painting is Holy
Mary and the chewing gum machine. The figure of the
Virgin is in the conventional blue gown, but holding a
chewing-gum capsule. The central image is a massive chewing-gum
machine which, in its close proximity to the Virgin, has
a disconcerting resemblance to modern votive shrines beneath
sacred figures in Catholic churches. These modern church
shrines have electric lights (not candles) activated by
a coin in a slot. Perhaps this painting, with the religious
connotations of its gold frame, is a comment on the secularisation
of Irish society where the ritual of getting chewing gum
in return for a coin has replaced the pious folk rituals
of the past. The painting has certain similarities to
the work of Conor Walton whose approach has a strong intellectual
current allied to realism.
In formal terms the exhibition is a virtuoso technical
performance. There is a complete command of realistic
techniques.
 |
| Geraldine
O'Neill: Bird trinity, 2003, oil on linen,
51 x 76 cm;courtesy Kevin Kavanagh Gallery |
The objects are often viewed at very close quarters and
from above, creating a strong dramatic impact which can
be claustrophobic. Drawing and composition are tightly
controlled, sometimes using a diagonal grid. There is
particular mastery of lighting: major lights, reflected
lights, cast shadows, and high lights. Textures of all
kinds are captured. The warm colours further enhance the
elaborate qualities of the display.
There is a light-hearted playfulness and humour about
much of this work but that is not to subvert the seriousness
of the intention. However, with such a technique at her
command, perhaps the artist might consider broadening
the intellectual range of her subject matter in the future.
John Turpin is head of History of Art and Design,
and Complementary Studies, National College of Art and
Design, Dublin.
Geraldine O'Neill: Snab Smaointe, Kevin
Kavanagh Gallery, April/May 2003
Article reproduced
from CIRCA 104, Summer 2003,
pp. 92-93.
Do
you have an opinion on this article? If so, please click here for our comments form.
| No reader feedback so far - awaiting your input! |
Back
to top of page
|