|
C105 review
New York: The
American effect at Whitney
|

Gilles
Barbier: Nursing home; courtesy Whitney Museum
of American Art
|
The American
Effect at the Whitney is an attempt to provide America
with foreign perspectives on its global influence. At once
critical and salutary, the show gives rise to several uncomfortable
and problematic issues - not least its egocentric premise,
as it perpetuates an image of political and cultural superiority.
Thankfully there are works that explore the blurring of
nationalism brought on by technology and globalization,
and the major works in the exhibition rise above the obligatory
inclusions.
The exhibition
creates a picture of a hypothetical American national
identity that is divided, full of hope and fraught with
problems. The decisions of the show's American curator,
Lawrence Rinder, inevitably shape this picture, and he
doesn't make any selections that will shock liberal New
Yorkers. By design, the strongest criticism in the show
is aimed at the imperialist implications of Bush-era policy,
and by extension the conservative block of America that
elected him.
|

Siemon
Allen: Newspapers cut, installation shot;
courtesy Whitney Museum of American Art
|
This has
two symbolic effects in relation to how Americans carefully
construct an identity that balances the egalitarian premise
of capitalism with the reality of the global imbalance
of wealth and power. It's a national cognitive dissonance.
At the risk of gross generalization, liberal Americans
criticize foreign and domestic policies, creating human
chains on Fifth Avenue, to balance this hypocrisy. Several
works make reference to the mythical liberalism of Kennedy
and Clinton. Conservative middle Americans rally around
nationalism and invoke capitalism to explain away gross
global inequity. This portion of the country lacks the
self-awareness to even offer the liberal impression of
righteous indignation at America's gross consumption of
world resources. Bjorn Melhus's deeply embarrassing video,
America sells, is perhaps the only video that captures
this American identity.
This is
important to Rinder's overall picture, because his selections
largely reflect the self-criticism found in most American
art. The show plays to New Yorkers, whose identities are
built around a sense of self-criticality and dissatisfaction
with social injustice. None of the artists in the show
present anything that liberals don't already hypocritically
accept. It will only upset the conservative hegemony that
will view many of the works as anti-American, but this
is the audience Rinder is lecturing to.
|

Siemon
Allen: Newspapers cut (detail); courtesy
Whitney Museum of American Art
|
The best
work in the show explicitly captures the blurring of cultural
or national identities through our common, globally mediated
experiences. The vast majority of the artists live in
major cities, with dual residencies. They share Western
artistic practices, often combined with traditional techniques
to convey their layered cultural experience. The major
works are plainly good and don't need to be propped up
by the curatorial theme.
French
artist Gilles Barbier's Nursing home is a collection
of hyperreal sculptures of aging American superheroes.
The paunchy and saggy forms of icons like Captain America
and Wonder Woman reverberate with meaning: the weakening
of NATO, aging baby-boomers, America's fascination with
youth culture, or its failing abilities as a superpower.
The flawlessly crafted sculptures match the realism of
Ron Mueck and Patricia Higgins, while exploring mortality
with wit.
Simeon
Allen's Newspapers cuts through the self-gratifying
tone of the exhibition with his wall of white-washed pages
of the Washington Post and Times. Allen
covers each page with tissue paper, clipping only the
areas mentioning South Africa. The articles range from
tiny obituaries to front-page headlines. Formally, the
effect is stunning, and the myriad of passive voices create
a complex picture of a troubled state that mirrors aspects
of America's troubled past, its indigenous population
and slavery. Post-Apartheid South Africa comes across
as a wounded nation after the Cold War politics that allowed
apartheid to continue for far too long. It is a difficult
piece, and despite the intended comparison between the
two papers, it is the absolute focus on South Africa that
is compelling.
|


Andrea Geyer:
Interim, installation shots; courtesy Whitney
Museum of American Art
|
Gerard
Byrne's unassuming video installation why its time
for imperial, again mourns the mundane reality that
lies below the surface of the spectacle of globalization,
art, and politics. The installation consists of a series
of photos and a video recreation of an interview between
Lee Iaccoca and Frank Sinatra in a 1980s auto ad. The
absurd interview sounds completely canned. Byrne, a sharp
satirist, re-enacts the interview with two actors, but
places them far away from the luxury they describe. The
exchange occurs in a depressed urban environment, perhaps
a section of Detroit or Dublin, a withering contrast between
desire and reality. Although some of the dialogue is humorous,
its tinge of melancholy and thinly veiled indictment of
American foreign policy cuts.
Andrea
Geyer's Interim is composed of enormous stacks
of a free newspapers. While the premise of the free multiples
calls to mind Felix González-Torres, the paper itself
is an oddly beautiful, nonlinear narrative of marginalized
experience. The feeling of alienation found in the vignettes
may be the experience of a recent immigrant to the city
- but as observed by a narrator familiar with the customs
and laws. The detached narrator observes the anonymous
female protagonist as she moves through the city. Geyer's
analog montage is a baleful expression, every aspect delineating
the experience - from the imposing volume of identical
multiples to the formal qualities of the spare layout
of text and desolate photography.
Two videos
by German artist Bjorn Melhus embody the attraction and
repulsion that characterizes America's internal and external
relationships. The near-perfect 1990 video America
sells is the prize of the show. Melhus maniacally
edits his footage of a teenage song-and-dance routine.
The color-coordinated ensemble insanely sings and dances,
while selling T-shirts to stupefied Germans. Melhus manages
to formally match the absurd spectacle of the zealous
Americans through brilliant editing. This America is mercifully
ignorant of its own appearance, and dangerously unaware
of its own power.
The painful
video digs deep into the 'Walmart' mentality of American
consumerism: bigger, cheaper, and branded. Melhus's view
of Americans echoes an observation of the zombies at the
end of the re-make of Night of the Living Dead:
"They are us."
His second
video, Far far away, re-casts The Wizard of
Oz as a fable of globalization and a longing-for-television
version of America. The thirty-nine minute video is done
a huge disservice by being presented on a small monitor
with two stools and two sets of headphones. The 1995 video
features Melhus playing dual roles - a sad, German Dorothy,
and her media-savvy American twin. The stinging criticism
of America sells is paired with his own fascination
with American culture and its media-driven myths.
The rest
of the show offers less developed works, alternately critical
or nearly adulatory. Saira Wasim and Hisashi Tenmyouya
stand out with their equally intelligent and deeply critical
paintings. Wasim borrows from a variety of practices from
Mughal Dynasty technique to Renaissance religious paintings.
Her exquisite paintings in the Bush series critique
the heavy U.S. involvement in Pakistani politics, while
the Western religious compositions and imagery reference
Bush's thinly veiled Christian, imperialist doctrine.
Tenmyouya's paintings mix the language of traditional
Japanese prints with contemporary graffiti art, drawing
imagery from both eras to critique America's difficult
and aggressive relationship with Japan. His painting,
Black ships atomic bombs, and the Greenville, depicting
a mutant sea-dragon belching an atomic cloud, is far more
effective than all of the text combined.
|

Gerard
Byrne: why its time for imperial, again,
installation shot; courtesy the artist/Whitney Museum
of American Art
|
The salutary
works that portray America in a positive light employ
both pop culture and enduring American myths like the
Old West. Young-hae Chang Heavy Industries presents a
strobe-like video of flashing text, synched to a drum
solo in Dakota. The digital hybrid of beat and
concrete poetry concerns an imagined road trip that plays
on America's escapist myths. The myth of the West and
its promise of reinvention in America figures prominently
in Miwa Yanagi's Yuka, a photographic enactment
of a young Japanese girl's imagined old-age fantasy, as
a free-spirited, motorcycle-riding granny living in San
Francisco. The humorous image perfectly captures an American
dream.
Canadian
artist Mark Lewis cheerily makes the most out of America's
fascination with beauty with his steadycam film, Jay's
garden, Malibu, which depicts a modern Eden where
porn stars stroll about. The camera gliding silently through
flora and fauna never focuses on them, content to drift
voyeuristically along the surface of things. It's a beautiful
foil to Heavy Industries' frenzy, while puritanical guilt
and feminist critique hover around the fringes of this
guilty pleasure.
The rest
of the show is characterized by works that fail to resonate
beyond the easy categorization found in the catalogue.
Terms like 'freedom' and 'abundance' sincerely and ironically
represent one-dimensional works like Danwen Xing's large-format
photographs documenting U.S. computer waste that has created
poisonous smog over Southern China. It's a well-documented
problem, but Xing's images don't humanize the issue.
A feature-length
documentary film series spread out over an imposing weekly
schedule, and the catalogue essays, add to a deadening
academic weight which makes the show feel more anthropological
than artistic. It only adds to the portrait of a flawed,
but concerned nation that masks a deeply felt dissonance
between its political lobes that affect the white majority,
minorities, and the immigrant population alike. Ultimately,
the show reaffirms the hypocritical liberal identity that
valued complacency during the prosperous Clinton era and
scolds the conservative national identity for imperialist
tendencies. It remains, sadly, about maintaining a contrite
world appearance through the arts.
William
Powhida is a writer based in New York.
The
American Effect, curated by Lawrence Rinder, Whitney
Museum of American Art, July - October 2003
Do
you have an opinion on this article? If so, please click
here for our comments form.
| No reader feedback so far - awaiting your input! |
|
|