Current issue


C106 article

Cocteau: il était une fois

James Armstrong explores the continuing significance of Jean Cocteau's La belle et la bête in visual culture.

Late night television can sometimes yield unexpected surprises.

This summer as I surfed the channels of weekend viewing, the music of Georges Auric played over black and white images of a seventeenth-century Holland. I was immediately faced with the dilemma "'to watch or not to watch'. It was Jean Cocteau's Beauty and the beast (La belle et la bête). Was I in the mood to commit to an hour and a half of film that I had already experienced numerous times before? Within five minutes I had left all hesitation behind and entered a realm that was at once second nature and brand new.

The first time I saw this film during the late sixties, I was a teenager from a small New England town watching the spare TV in my parents' bedroom. A local alternative station was hosting a summer season of European cinema. Fellini's La dolca vita and Bergman's The seventh seal had aired in previous weeks. I had never seen anything like La belle et la bête before; I simply could not take my eyes off it.

I recall seeing Cocteau's masterpiece on the big screen, some years later, at the Elgin Theatre on 8th Avenue in New York City. It has always held up for me in large or small format. It would resurface from time to time on television or as stock images in textbooks, magazines and journals. The US theatrical re-release of the film opened August 16th 2002, at New York's Film Forum. It has consistently been a source of wonder for me. It is, as any important work of art, culturally embedded.

The quality of the print broadcast on television this summer was superb. The tones were lush with sharp contrasts that showcased Cocteau's masterful use of light and texture. The special effects had not grown old or tired. Even when the film was made, Melies had already pioneered most of the optical tricks Cocteau used, but it is Cocteau's concise and imaginative use of special effects that make them an essential part of the narrative, not the formulaic icing of digital special effects over narrative content that defines so much of contemporary cinema. La belle et la bête is a triumph of low-tech wonders.

The story had existed in both written and oral forms for centuries before the well known version by Madame Leprince de Beaumont, written while she was a governess in Scotland. At the end of World War 2, Jean Marais suggested to Cocteau that the fable might work well as a film and serve as a distraction for war-weary France. The film was shot in the summer of 1945 with Jean Marais cast as La bête and Josette Day as Belle. The post-war French film industry was in disarray with equipment and raw film stock scarce, studio time impossible to secure and general social conditions austere.

" I chose that particular fable because it corresponded to my personal mythology," Cocteau said, but in his diaries he wrote that the production of the film was a nightmare. During the war the Vichy government had branded Cocteau as 'decadent'. The pro-Nazi paper,Je suis partout, vilified his theatre work as "perverted and Judaic," while many of his contemporaries considered him to have been a collaborator.

Along with five other films, La belle et la bête was chosen to represent France in the first Cannes Festival of 1946. It was panned by the critics and considered to be static, object-laden, over-stylized and expressionistic. It went against the grain of the current trend towards realism. Critics said that some images displayed the "affected simperings of an old queen."

Cocteau made only six films over a thirty-year period. He was forty years old when he came to the cinema. La belle et la bete was his second film and was shot sixteen years after the making of Le sang d'un poète, a short surrealistic film made in 1930 and the thematic forerunner of his subsequent film output. He considered himself a poet first and filmmaker second. Poetry was the basis for all art, "a religion without hope." Cocteau was an innovator in ballet, theatre, and literature. He also worked in the plastic arts, creating drawings, posters, lithographs, sculpture, ceramics and tapestries. He devoted a good amount of his time to promoting himself as 'artist' and cultural celebrity, meticulously constructing a public persona that rubbed against the conservative morality of his time and the innate homophobia of the avant-garde boy's club, the surrealist movement.

Assertive in his homosexuality, Cocteau showcased his lover of ten years, Jean Marais, in L'Eternal retour in 1942. La belle et la bête made Marais a star.

His dual roles in the film, the handsome Avenant and the troubled Beast, paint a moral lesson; one's nature matters more than appearance. Marais is Cocteau's cinematic alter ego, the face Cocteau uses as his screen personification and muse. Marais is Orpheus/Narcissus and the Orphic myth is the means of expression and core allegory that Cocteau used for his life story, a life story that is ethnographic and archetypal as regards the modern day myths that surround the contemporary art and film world.

Filled with iconic moments, La belle et la bête is nostalgic, as every real fairytale must be, constructing an environment, a tableau that allows the viewer to enter and become absorbed. Mostly shot in medium close-ups, the actors, props, lighting, and the framing of shots constantly refer to other things. It is postmodern in its 'modernity' and stuffed with referential pictorial elements that allude to Vermeer, Freudian pychology, Jungian symbolism and Grand Opera. It takes a very pro-feminist view of the main female character. Unlike the generic female narrative in films of the late forties, she is not punished but rewarded for her individuality with very little consequence other than her positive emotional growth and eventual happiness.

Cocteau's stage experience allowed him to direct the action and elicit performances that are operatic in nature. Josette Day's experience as a dancer gave her performance a certain lyrical motion. She moves her body in response to the lines that Marais, as the Beast, delivers. There is a point/counterpoint to the interplay between these two characters. Punctuated with silence and then soundtrack, the quality of both Marais' and Day's voices and the communicative dance of subtle body movements between them become musical. This is one of the core visual texts in cinematic and art history.

Cocteau is essentially a Catholic artist. He wrote the play Orphée in 1925 when he was regularly using opium and was being converted to Catholicism by Jacques Maritain. Seduced artistically and spiritually by the surrealists, who later abjectly rejected him, the script refers to his abandonment of surrealism and the restrictions of any artistic movement, for his true inspiration, the church. The play Orphée was originally conceived as an interpretation of Christ's life. His conversion to the church was a failure but the influence of religious iconography is evident in the sumptuous medieval costuming and spotlit portraiture that illuminates so many of the scenes in the Beast's castle. The scene in which Belle has belatedly returned to find the dying Beast, lying motionless by his drinking pond as she takes him in her arms, is reminiscent of a Baroque pietà.

Cocteau states in Le sang d'un poète that he wanted to "photograph poetry in a documentary way." He invents a psychological landscape in which the palm of his poet/hero's hand has a wound that turns into a mouth begging for air. The duality of the erotic and the creative, the masturbatory and the communicative, juxtaposed against the dualities of guilt and punishment persist throughout the various vignettes which speak about the Orphic experience and how the artist creates by finding inspiration.

Later from a film title we read, " the ritual journey of its suicidal and self-abusive hero poet who enters the Hotel des Folies as if in a dream and proceeds to view certain mysteries through keyholes, involving love, death, punishment and art." With a simple change of the last word in this quote, the dominant concerns of Catholicism are mirrored; love, death, punishment and spectacle. The hero/poet voyeuristically looks into each keyhole/gloryhole, secretly witnessing fetishistic passion plays that are a mirror into his own subconscious. Cocteau uses the motif of the mirror consistently in his films. Mirror as peephole and portal. "Mirrors are the doors through which death comes and goes..." Orphée (1950). Beyond the mirror is the Zone.

Cocteau's work is always self-referential. He weaves his autobiographical imagery into the fabric of far older and recognizable narratives. In the film Orphée, Jean Marais plays the part of a well-heeled man of letters who has become too famous, 'the national poet'. As he enters the Café des Poètes, the new poet-of-the-moment Cegeste (played by Edouard Dermit) confronts him, muttering contemptuously. This metaphor represents Cocteau's rejection in 1949 by a young public, the new generation of the Saint-Germain-des-Prés. Cocteau establishes a tension between the artist and the celebrity, between the new and the old, the divergent and the convergent. He was an artist that inhabited the cusp. "When you smash a statue, you risk becoming one yourself."

How does a summer's viewing of Cocteau's La belle et la bête substantiate the influence of this maestro? In the early 1950s the critics of the Cahiers du Cinema, responsible for initiating the idea of the 'auteur', said that Cocteau was a director whose personal stamp was evident in every film that he had made. He was praised for being a "film-maker's film maker." Jean-Luc Godard said that La belle et la bête was influential in the making of Alphaville (1965), especially in the use of lighting and camera angles. Alan Resnais used Orphée as a model when constructing shots with his Japanese cameraman on the set of Hiroshima mon amour (1959). Cocteau's work was motivational for such directors as Vincent Minelli, Agnes Varda, Pier Paolo Pasolini and Ingmar Bergman. Francois Truffaut was such an admirer of Cocteau's work that he helped produce his last film, Le testament d'Orphée (1959). Cocteau's influence on la Nouvelle Vague is duly acknowledged.

The domino effect of the French New Wave on films produced during the seventies and early eighties is without question. Le sang d'un poète's direct influence on Underground Film is equally apparent. New Gay Cinema acknowledges its debt to Cocteau. Jean Genet, Kenneth Anger, Willard Maas and Ben Moore (Narcissus, 1956) were all affected by Cocteau's use of space - the ordinary-sized room or studio set where marvellous things can happen. Even in contemporary popular culture, Star Trek - the Next Generation has used the Beauty-and-the-beast motif as a basis for the relationship between the Betazoid Counselor Deanna Troi and the Klingon Lieutenant Worf.

Filmmakers not only influence other filmmakers, they influence and act as subtexts in all creative mediums. Visual culture is an interconnected web of signs and symbols that resonates in the work of nearly every contemporary artist. Whether one speaks about Film Noir, Sci-Fi, the fantasy genre, video, photography, the comic book, pop art or contemporary literature, forms and structure are shuffled and reshuffled. The cinematic eye has pervaded every art form.

In a world where visual imagery motivates and mitigates, we are all members of the viewing audience, watching a film or studying an image in a book or magazine, breathing in mediated information from the television or the web. Each image, whether a reproduction of an existing image or a hybrid from the cultural database of communicative forms, is internalized. To see Cocteau's influence, look at the work of Pierre et Gilles, Matthew Barney or Joel Peter Witkin. The tableau and the similacrum are dominant structures in the work of artists who wish to refer and infer using the object as symbol, creating not only a conceptual space, but constructing allegorical spaces that refer to a library of stylistic and cultural references. The artist's stamp is a personal 'mise en scène' apparent throughout a consistent artistic career.

In February 2003, La belle et la bête was released as a DVD package presented in its original theatrical aspect ratio of 1.33:1. It contains a new high-definition digital transfer from the restored French negative initiated in 1995 by the Centre National de L'Audiovisuel in Luxemburg in association with the CLT-UFA International. The soundtrack print was restored at 24-bit using digital audio tools to reduce sound distortion. The package includes two soundtracks, the restored French-language monaural soundtrack and a Dolby Digital 5.5 Surround Soundtrack featuring the opera composed by Philip Glass. There is a new and improved translation for the English subtitles and commentaries by film historians Arthur Knight and Christopher Frayling. Extras include three documentaries featuring interviews with cast and crew and two versions of the trailer directed and narrated by Cocteau.

It is important to remember that Cocteau considered the making of La belle et la bête as a stance against the production practices of Hollywood and a return to the artisanal teamwork of traditional French film production. There is a message here for any young filmmaker or artist with a digital film camera in hand. One can still circumnavigate current trends and low budgets to tell one's personal fairytale. The Orphic experience is always pertinent. In Cocteau's words," Poetry is an ethic. By ethic I mean a secret code of behavior, a discipline constructed and conducted according to the capabilities of a person who rejects the falsifications of the categorical imperative."

James Armstrong is an artist who lectures on photography and new media at Dublin City University.

Article reproduced from CIRCA 106, Winter 2003, pp. 24-27.

Do you have an opinion on this article? If so, please click here for our comments form.


No reader feedback so far - awaiting your input!

Back to top of page

 

Art-college life: two new Circa surveys




Discounted Circa subscription rates



Please notify me about Circa-related acitvities; my e-mail address is:

It would also help us if you indicate your country of residence:

 
Sponsors (see Circa 'Friends'):
Major Supporters:   Partners:

  


art ireland irish
© Copyright 1999-2008
Circa Art Magazine
43/44 Temple Bar
Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel / Fax: +353 1 6797388
e-mail: info@recirca.com
  Our principal funders: